Where cameras and PAVA came from

In shortCameras were piloted from 2015 and PAVA announced for all adult male officers on 9 October 2018; both are now governed by HMPPS policy frameworks.

The camera pilot found no statistically significant difference in assault rates between pilot and comparator sites, a variable effect on relationships, and more positive views among staff and prisoners who were well informed and had seen cameras in use. The authors said the findings were built into training and rollout.

PAVA
Pelargonic acid vanillylamide. The HMPPS review describes it as an irritant spray dispensed from a hand-held canister in a liquid stream, containing a highly concentrated synthetic version of the irritant found in peppers.

From pilots to policy frameworks

  1. June to December 2015Camera pilot

    Six hundred cameras were deployed to 23 establishments. The Ministry of Justice published the evaluation in 2020, and BWVCs have since been rolled out to all prisons across England and Wales.

  2. 9 October 2018PAVA announced

    For all adult male prison officers after a pilot in four prisons (Hull, Preston, Risley and Wealstun), backed by £2 million.

  3. April 2019PAVA rollout begins

    Across the male category A to D estate, per HMPPS. The use of force review, published on 24 April 2025, says it was set up to improve monitoring ahead of the 2019 rollout.

  4. 20 September 2022BWVC Policy Framework

    Replaced the original instruction, PSI 04/2017.

  5. 27 November 2023Use of Force Policy Framework

    First published; re-issued 11 September 2025. It now governs PAVA and replaced PSO 1600, PSI 2015-30 and earlier PAVA and handcuff guidance.

Who wears a camera and how it works

In shortBand 3 to 5 closed-estate staff collect a camera each shift; it runs a pre-record buffer, is wholly overt and has limits in sensitive places.

The framework says that as a minimum all operational Band 3 to 5 staff within the closed estate must collect a camera from the docking station at the beginning of their shift.

In the open estate, roles designated by the governor in the Local Security Strategy must do so. Governors can deploy cameras to other roles where surplus cameras exist.

The camera enters stand-by mode when removed from the dock and runs a rolling "pre-record" buffer that is saved only when the user activates recording; the saved footage then includes the back-captured buffer. Staff must complete training and understand how to use the equipment within 90 days of first drawing a camera.

Use is "wholly overt"

  • Consider starting recording as early as possible when a situation is escalating, which may help de-escalation.
  • Make a clear verbal announcement that audio and video are being recorded, as soon as it is possible and safe. An example wording is: "for your safety and the safety of others you need to be aware that everything you say and do will be recorded."
  • Signage must tell people the cameras can capture audio; cameras are designed with lights, beeps and vibrations to show they are active.

Limits on use

Not allowed

  • Intentionally obscuring the lens or failing to record all or part of an incident without exceptional cause; Governors may treat obvious intentional misuse as a matter for investigation.
  • Stopping at a prisoner's request: this would be exceptional.

Take care

  • Consider switching off pre-record when entering sensitive staff areas such as locker rooms, places of worship, showers or toilets.
  • Using cameras in places with a higher expectation of privacy needs compelling reasons, such as a safety or security incident.
  • If a prisoner or visitor objects, the user must explain why recording is happening.

When to start, when to stop

In shortFootage should run uninterrupted from the start of an incident to a safe and secure end, and cameras support but never replace written statements.

The framework says recording ends when the incident has concluded to a safe and secure position or when continuing is no longer justifiable, necessary or proportionate.

The decision to stop must be recorded in the same way as the decision to start, and the reason given on camera before stopping where appropriate. The use of force framework adds that cameras should not be turned off until the prisoner is relocated, the incident is resolved and the hot debrief is complete.

Spontaneous versus planned force

Planned force

  • The use of force framework says a planned intervention should be recorded with a handheld camera.
  • The 2025 use of force review noted many cases where staff used BWVC during planned force despite policy saying handheld video should be used.
  • During a full search under restraint the camera operator should stay outside the room or direct the camera away from the prisoner to maintain decency, with the aim of capturing comments made.

Cameras are a support

  • BWVC footage does not replace written statements, incident reports or use of force statements.
  • Users must record the justification for use in the daily log and supporting documents.

After recording: statements, storage and retention

In shortFootage uploads automatically and is kept for up to 90 days unless tagged; use of force footage is kept for 6 years, and statements are written before footage is viewed.

Footage is classed as official-sensitive and uploads automatically when the camera goes back in its dock. Retention needs a documented justification reviewed at least every three months, and for exceptional retention a senior manager at Band 7 or above must complete the justification.

Users cannot be given IT authority to delete data they recorded; unintentional recordings go through a deletion request to the local system administrator.

BWVC retention periods in the HMPPS framework (20 September 2022)
FootageRetention
Routine, untaggedUp to 90 days, then automatic deletion
Personal injury to a prisoner or staff member3 years 4 months
Prisoner-on-prisoner assault (no C&R)3 years 4 months
Use of force, or assault with C&R used6 years from the date of incident
Exceptional retention for intelligence or identificationJustification by Band 7 or above, reviewed at least every 3 months

Source: Body Worn Video Cameras Policy Framework paras 4.82 to 4.92.

Who can see footage, and for what

In shortAccess is controlled: viewing needs a clear, justifiable need and the Governor's express permission, and routine review is discouraged.

A line manager with the Governor's express permission may view footage for professional standards purposes where there is a clear and justifiable need. The framework says there must not be a practice of routinely reviewing footage without a clear need, which could create mistrust and lead to data protection complaints.

  • Permitted purposes include use of force oversight meetings, supervision and training, investigating specific allegations or complaints, or where intelligence makes it proportionate.
  • Footage may be disclosed to the police, the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, HM Inspectorate of Prisons and Independent Monitoring Boards.
  • Potential corruption or misconduct captured on camera must be reported through the intelligence system and under the counter-corruption and conduct policies; incidental footage of misconduct captured without the subject's knowledge cannot be ignored.
  • Investigators must consider the conduct and discipline rules on disclosing relevant footage to the member of staff under investigation.
  • Footage can be used in training only with care: the framework asks whether anyone is identifiable, whether the setting is sensitive and whether alternatives exist, and staff captured must give express permission (and can withdraw it).

PAVA: when it may be used

In shortPAVA may only be used to defend against an attack or impending attack, when there is no other reasonable option and the use is proportionate.

The framework says PAVA can only be carried and used by operational staff trained and accredited in its use, working in establishments authorised to have it. Trained Band 3 to 5 officers in closed adult male prisons must carry it on duty but must not carry it beyond the establishment gate.

It cannot be taken on bed watches, escorts or external perimeter checks. In adult male open prisons it may only be carried by trained Band 3 to 5s working in night state.

It must not be used by local staff as part of a planned intervention, nor on prisoners at height or on members of the public.

All three conditions must be met

  • It is necessary to defend oneself or a third party from an attack or impending attack where the officer perceives a threat of immediate harm.
  • There is no other reasonable option to protect themselves or others and reduce the risk of immediate harm.
  • The use is proportionate to the seriousness of the threat.
  • PAVA must be drawn in an open and visible manner with a verbal warning, never covertly, with a clear verbal command to desist and continued instructions to encourage de-escalation and offer reassurance and aftercare. Where possible the prisoner should not be placed in the prone position afterwards.

After PAVA: aftercare, reporting and scrutiny

In shortAftercare, reporting and review are strict: observations four times an hour, a 24-hour incident report and monthly committee review.

  • Observations4 an hourMinimum, until the effects have subsided
  • Incident line and DPS24 hoursReport on the single incident line and record on the Digital Prison Service
  • Use of force statements72 hoursCompleted within
  • Healthcare review24 hoursPrisoners must see a registered healthcare professional within this time

Aftercare duties

  • A minimum of 4 observations per hour until the effects have subsided, unless a registered healthcare professional directs otherwise, and a healthcare professional should be available for the duration where possible.
  • Fresh air should be provided where reasonably practicable.
  • Every prisoner exposed, including secondary exposure, must have the information leaflet explained and be given a copy.
  • Where no registered healthcare professional is available, a staff member trained in PAVA aftercare fulfils the role and completes an observation sheet.
  • If clothing is contaminated, the prisoner or staff member must be offered a chance to change, and staff are told uniform may be laundered at home as usual.

Reporting and scrutiny

  • A PAVA incident must be reported on the single incident line within 24 hours, recorded on the Digital Prison Service within 24 hours and use of force statements completed within 72 hours.
  • An incident where PAVA is drawn but not deployed must also be reported using the official use of force report.
  • The discharged canister is sealed, double bagged in evidence bags and stored, and an evidence retention form is linked to the individual's record for 6 years from release or termination.
  • The prison's use of force committee must review all uses of PAVA and batons, and injuries to prisoners, at least monthly.
  • Prisoners must see a registered healthcare professional within 24 hours of force being used. See prison healthcare staff roles.
Free toolThinking about becoming an officer?Check age, residency, health and record against the published entry requirements.Open the free checker

What the evidence shows

In shortPAVA and batons are rare techniques, footage capture varies widely between prisons, and the pilots found no clear reduction in violence.

  • Reported uses of force160,897Across 121 establishments, April 2018 to March 2023 (about 40,000 a year)
  • PAVA deployed0.8%323 uses; 387 on manual returns, 0.9% (2021/22)
  • Baton used0.3%150 uses; 0.5% on the Digital Prison Service (2021/22)
  • BWVC footage available51%Of 38,603 force records, year to March 2022

The most useful public numbers are in HMPPS's use of force evaluation, published on 24 April 2025 and covering the adult estate from April 2018 to March 2023. In April 2021 to March 2022, control and restraint was 50.5% of techniques used, handcuffs 34.7%, personal protection (SPEAR) 12.6%, PAVA 0.8% and batons 0.3%.

Use of force techniques recorded, adult estate, April 2021 to March 2022 (121 prisons)
TechniqueNumber of usesShare of all force
Control and restraint21,68750.5%
Handcuffs14,88734.7%
Personal protection (SPEAR)5,39312.6%
Other5021.2%
PAVA deployed3230.8%
Baton used1500.3%

Source: HMPPS Use of Force Evaluation Report (24 April 2025), Table 1. Total 42,942; a single incident can involve more than one technique. Data quality caveats apply.

Why force is used

  • Of baton uses, 70%, and of PAVA uses, 84%, were in response to assaults or fighting.
  • 5% of baton and 2% of PAVA use related to preventing self-harm.

PAVA annex, April 2019 to April 2023

609 incidents, of which 409 (67.2%) had PAVA drawn and deployed and 200 (32.8%) drawn only. Black or Black British people were 40% of those affected and 49% of those affected were aged 18 to 20.

The report says black men face elevated rates of certain techniques including batons and PAVA, and women tend to experience some of the highest rates of force overall. It does not claim to explain why, and it warns that the correlations it found are weak to moderate.

Higher rates of force at establishments correlated with higher Band 3 to 5 resignation rates and staff sickness and lower prisoner engagement in purposeful activity, though causation was not tested.

Cameras

The review examined 38,603 force records for the year to March 2022 and found BWVC footage available in 51%, with capture varying from above 85% to below 20% between prisons with over 200 uses of force.

Footage was present in 68% of planned force but 49% of spontaneous force, 52% in the men's estate against 42% in the women's estate, and 46% for incidents involving assaults.

It cited international research that officers wearing cameras use less force and that discretion over switching them on affects results.

The pilots

The 2015 BWVC pilot found no statistically significant difference in assault rates.

The PAVA pilot evaluation was not initially published; the Prison Reform Trust obtained it and reported in April 2019 that it concluded PAVA did nothing to reduce violence, that guidance appeared to be breached or misapplied in 68% of the 50 deployments examined and that staff showed over-reliance in some cases.

That is the PRT's reading of an HMPPS document we have not seen in full, so treat it as a secondary account.

Practical guidance for officers and candidates

In shortStart the camera early, announce it, write your own statement from memory on time, and use PAVA only in the narrow circumstances allowed.

For the kit side see prison officer uniform and equipment, and for the legal basis prison officer powers and legal authority.

If you are a candidate, understand that you will be trained on this before you carry it. The foundation training covers control and restraint and de-escalation, and use of force training must be refreshed annually for front-line staff (8 hours of practical skills plus e-learning).

If you are a serving officer

  • Start the camera early and announce it.
  • Keep it running until the incident is over and the debrief is done.
  • Write your own statement from memory on time before watching anything.
  • Use PAVA only in the narrow circumstances allowed and with proper aftercare.
  • If a use of force is questioned, get advice from your union early; see POA representation.

Frequently asked questions

Do prison officers wear body cameras?

Yes. Operational Band 3 to 5 staff in the closed estate must collect a body-worn camera from the docking station at the start of each shift.

It stays in pre-record mode until the officer activates it, and the officer must announce recording as soon as it is safe. Open prisons use cameras for roles designated by the governor.

Are prison body cameras always recording?

No. They run a rolling pre-record buffer and save footage only when the officer activates recording, at which point the preceding buffer is included. Routine untagged footage is deleted after up to 90 days. Use of force footage is kept for 6 years.

When can a prison officer use PAVA?

Only when it is necessary to defend themselves or a third party from an attack or impending attack, there is no other reasonable option and the use is proportionate. It must be drawn openly with a verbal warning. It cannot be used on prisoners at height, in planned interventions by local staff or on escorts.

Do all prison officers carry PAVA?

Trained Band 3 to 5 officers in closed adult male prisons must carry it on duty. In adult male open prisons it is carried only by trained Band 3 to 5 officers working night state. Local staff do not carry batons in women's or youth establishments, and PAVA is not carried beyond the gate.

What happens to a prisoner after PAVA is used?

Affected prisoners must be observed at least four times an hour until the effects subside, a healthcare professional should be available where possible, fresh air is provided where practicable and an information leaflet is explained.

They must see healthcare within 24 hours of force and the incident is reviewed by the prison's use of force committee.

Can an officer watch the footage before writing a statement?

No. The framework requires use of force statements to be freely recalled and written before viewing CCTV or body-worn footage, and within 72 hours. If an officer views footage afterwards and wants to add detail, they provide an addendum that says it follows viewing.

Do cameras and PAVA reduce violence?

The evidence is mixed. A 2015 camera pilot found no statistically significant difference in assault rates. A PRT account of the PAVA pilot said it did not reduce violence and was often used outside guidance. HMPPS's 2025 review found large local variation in use and footage capture.

Sources