The short answer: the process carries on without you
In shortResigning does not end the matter: HMPPS can complete the investigation and decide on exclusion in your absence.
Many people under investigation think that leaving ends the matter. In England and Wales, HMPPS policy is built to prevent exactly that assumption.
The Exclusion from Working for HMPPS Policy Framework was issued on 14 October 2024 and is in force from 1 January 2025. The counter corruption policy is even more explicit: corruption allegations must be formally resolved after resignation.
What continues after you resign
- The investigation must be completed when someone resigns.
- The vetting team must be informed of the outcome.
- A Governor or Head of Unit at Civil Service Grade 6 can decide on exclusion afterwards, and the decision can be made in your absence.
- A criminal investigation, if there is one, belongs to the police and the prosecution authorities and has nothing to do with whether you are still employed. The Counter Corruption and Reporting Wrongdoing Policy Framework says a criminal investigation takes primacy and that staff must support police and CPS, a duty the police can pursue regardless.
Why our advice is cautious
Resignation can be the right decision in some circumstances, for example where the issue is a good-faith disagreement about suitability and nothing in the background could lead to exclusion.
But where there is a conduct allegation of any seriousness, the practical effect of resigning is often to give up the chance to put your case to a hearing and appeal without escaping the consequences. Speak to the POA or a solicitor first.
What the published framework says, point by point
In shortThe framework lets HMPPS exclude people who resign during an investigation, for up to ten years or indefinitely, with a 15 working day appeal.
On the other side of the ledger, the framework says poor performance alone is not a reason to exclude.
If the process you are in is a performance or capability one, resignation does not bring the same risks, although you should still consider your tribunal rights and pension. See our guide to poor performance and capability.
- The register
- A central record of people excluded from working for HMPPS in any capacity. It applies to directly employed and non-directly employed staff who are dismissed for gross misconduct, or for misconduct that poses an underlying safety or security risk, and it applies where a person resigns during an investigation.
- The decision
- Made on the balance of probabilities, after a meeting with the individual, which may proceed in their absence if they decline or do not attend. A written notice must explain the decision and the appeal rights.
- Length and scope
- Exclusion may be for up to ten years or indefinite, and may apply to one establishment or unit, a category of establishment or the whole of HMPPS. A person who is suspended pending an investigation can be temporarily excluded, so that they cannot move to another HMPPS job to escape the process.
- Appeal
- Write to Personnel Security Vetting within 15 working days of the notice; the appeal is decided in correspondence by a Prison Group Director, Regional Probation Director or Deputy Director. If a criminal investigation is running, the time limit for the appeal is paused.
| Question | If you resign during an investigation |
|---|---|
| Does the investigation continue? | Yes: HMPPS must finish it and tell the vetting team the outcome |
| Can you be put on the Exclusions Register? | Yes, up to 10 years or indefinite, decided by a Grade 6 Governor or Head of Unit; can proceed in your absence |
| Can you appeal an exclusion? | Yes, in writing within 15 working days to Personnel Security Vetting |
| Is a criminal investigation affected? | No: police and CPS decide; HMPPS policy says criminal investigation takes primacy in corruption cases |
| Can you claim unfair dismissal? | Generally not, because there is no dismissal, unless the resignation is a constructive dismissal; seek advice |
| Is your pension forfeited? | Not by resignation; forfeiture needs a conviction and a Minister's certificate or a debt; you become a deferred member |
| Is your vetting status affected? | Vetting status is withdrawn when an exclusion is reported |
Sources: Exclusion from Working for HMPPS Policy Framework; Counter Corruption and Reporting Wrongdoing Policy Framework; SI 2014/1964 regs 165 to 169.
Why people resign, and what you give up
In shortResigning is understandable after a long process, but it usually gives up your hearing, appeal and unfair dismissal route.
People resign for understandable reasons: to avoid the stress of a long process, to start a new job, to avoid a dismissal on their record, to protect their health, or because they believe the outcome is already decided.
The Moorland case, whose judgment was published on 29 September 2026, shows how long a process can take. A process of that length is draining, and it is not unusual to feel that leaving would be a relief.
What you usually give up by resigning
- The hearing, at which you could put your case, call evidence and be accompanied by a union representative, and the appeal.
- The employment tribunal route for unfair dismissal, because there is no dismissal to challenge unless you can show you were forced out. A tribunal could treat a resignation as a constructive dismissal only in limited circumstances, where the employer has fundamentally breached the contract and you resigned in response, and that is a hard case to run.
- Your pay: the Scottish Prison Service code, for comparison, says that salary may be withheld as a set-off against losses to public funds where someone resigns before a dismissal can take effect in fraud cases. We do not know of an equivalent in the England and Wales policy and do not suggest it applies.
- The chance of a better outcome than you fear. The HMPPS conduct policy, in the last public text, says that no one will be dismissed for a first breach of discipline except for gross misconduct, that the primary objective is to encourage improvement, and that the standard of proof is the balance of probabilities with a higher standard for more serious allegations. Many matters end in no action or a warning. Your union rep can tell you how likely that is in your case.
The Moorland case
- 18 July 2024Suspension
- 4 December 2024Investigation report
After four extensions of the terms of reference.
- February and March 2025Three-day hearing
- 6 May 2025Appeal decision
Pension, sick pay and notice
In shortResigning does not forfeit your accrued pension by itself, but it closes off ill-health retirement, so ask for quotes first.
- 2+ years' alpha serviceDeferred pensionPayable from normal pension age, or early from 55 (57 from 6 April 2028) with a reduction
- Under 2 yearsRefundYou may be entitled to a refund of contributions
- Ill-health retirementClosed offDeferred members cannot get it
Resigning does not by itself affect your accrued pension. Your normal pension age is the later of your State Pension age and 65. Resignation does not prevent forfeiture rules applying after a conviction, nor the recovery of debts and losses from criminal, negligent or fraudulent acts. See our guide to misconduct and your pension.
If you are off sick, resigning has its own implications for sick pay, and for your right to benefit from any ongoing attendance support.
Contractual notice is set by your contract, and employers can ask you to work notice or place you on garden leave. We could not verify HMPPS-specific rules on notice during an investigation and do not state them. The sick pay calculator can help you model the pay position if you are absent.
Your tribunal rights after resigning
In shortUnfair dismissal needs a dismissal, but discrimination and whistleblowing claims can still be brought after you leave, within strict time limits.
The time limits are strict. GOV.UK says you usually have to make a claim within 6 months of your employment ending or the problem happening, and the Government's timeline update records that the six-month limit took effect on 1 October 2026 for most claims.
You must tell Acas before claiming, and the time limit is paused during early conciliation.
The qualifying period for ordinary unfair dismissal is two years up to 31 December 2026, and six months where the effective date of termination is on or after 1 January 2027, with the compensation cap removed from that date under SI 2026/559. Take advice on the dates, because transitional rules apply.
POA legal assistance is not retrospective: the POA legal handbook says that no initial advice or assistance is given for proceedings started or under investigation before the person joined or re-joined.
If you are not a member and are under investigation, ask the POA whether you can get help. Do not assume that joining now gives cover for the current matter.
Which claims survive resignation
Generally not available
- Ordinary unfair dismissal needs a dismissal, and a resignation is not one.
- Unless the legal test for constructive dismissal is met, there is no claim, however you feel about the process.
Can still be brought
- Discrimination, harassment and victimisation claims under the Equality Act 2010.
- Whistleblowing detriment claims.
- Neither requires dismissal or a minimum period of service. If you were bullied, discriminated against or victimised because you raised a concern, resigning does not necessarily end that claim.
Vetting, references and what a future employer will see
In shortAn exclusion withdraws your vetting status, and reference policy is not published, so be honest with any future vetted employer.
When an exclusion is reported, the vetting team withdraws your security vetting status.
If you are not excluded, the investigation outcome may still be recorded, and vetting policy requires staff to report changes in circumstances, including disciplinary procedures and security incidents including employer sanctions for code of conduct misconduct. A future vetted employer will ask about your history and expect honest answers.
See our guides to security clearance withdrawn and misconduct and future employment.
- References
- HMPPS reference policy is not published and we cannot say what a reference will state for someone who resigned during an investigation. Employers are generally expected to give factually accurate references, but there is no general duty to provide one. If you are negotiating terms, ask for the agreed reference to be put in writing.
- Honesty
- Never mislead a future employer about the circumstances of your leaving, because an omission discovered later can be a separate ground for refusal or dismissal.
- Continuing duties
- The Civil Service Code, which bound you as an HMPPS employee, expects honesty and integrity. Resigning does not remove your continuing duties on confidentiality and the Official Secrets Act, and a post-employment disclosure of confidential material can have separate consequences.
Criminal investigations: a separate track
In shortA criminal investigation is separate from employment: resigning will not stop police or CPS action.
- Misconduct in public officeLifeMaximum; expressly covers prison officers and staff of contracted prisons (CPS guidance)
- Prison Act 1952 s.40BUp to 10 yearsConveying List A items without authority
- Public Office (Accountability) BillNot lawLords second reading 1 September 2026; committee days from 12 October 2026
If the matter involves possible offences, such as misconduct in public office or conveyance offences under the Prison Act 1952, the criminal process is separate. The Public Office (Accountability) Bill would replace the common law offence of misconduct in public office.
It is not law, and we have not verified whether it will cover every prison officer.
HMPPS policy says that staff must support police and CPS with statements and evidence, and that the police Senior Investigating Officer, in consultation with HMPPS, decides priority between the criminal and disciplinary tracks in corruption cases.
If you are interviewed under caution
- POA legal cover can apply for interviews under caution on work-related matters, and does not normally extend to witness interviews except in exceptional approved cases.
- Contact the POA at once and a criminal solicitor if you are arrested or asked to attend voluntarily. Our guide to prison officer interviews under caution explains the position.
- Resignation will not change the police's ability to investigate; be careful not to say anything about the matter to colleagues, on social media or to the prisoner or others involved.
A decision checklist before you hand in notice
In shortSlow down: test whether resignation really delivers what you want before you hand in notice.
If you are thinking about resigning, slow down. Take the time you can. Write down what you want to achieve: leave the service, protect your health, avoid a dismissal, or something else. Then test whether resignation really delivers that, given what you now know about the investigation, exclusion, vetting and pension.
Where you are determined to leave, ask your union rep or solicitor whether it would be better to resign after the hearing or appeal, or as part of an agreed settlement, and make sure you know the tribunal time limit and your pension options before the last day.
Our general guide to what happens after dismissal and to the disciplinary process will help you weigh up the alternatives.
- Ask in writing what stage the investigation is at and what the allegations are.
- Speak to your POA rep or a solicitor before you resign or agree anything.
- Ask HR for pension quotes and ill-health or early-retirement advice.
- Ask what reference and vetting information will be given.
- If a settlement is offered, take independent legal advice and ask for it in writing.
- Diarise the six-month tribunal limit and the 15 working day exclusion appeal window.
Frequently asked questions
If I resign, does the investigation stop?
No. The Exclusion from Working for HMPPS Policy Framework says the investigation continues after resignation, the vetting team is told the outcome and a Grade 6 Governor or Head of Unit can still decide on exclusion in your absence. Counter corruption cases must also be formally resolved after resignation.
Can I be put on the Exclusions Register if I have already left?
Yes. The framework applies to staff who resign during an investigation as well as those dismissed. Exclusion can last up to ten years or be indefinite and cover one establishment, a category of establishment or the whole of HMPPS. You can appeal within 15 working days of notification.
Will I lose my pension if I resign during an investigation?
Not by resigning. Under the 2014 alpha regulations benefits can be withheld only after conviction for specified offences, with a Minister's certificate in some cases, or to recover debts and losses from criminal, negligent or fraudulent acts. With two or more years' qualifying service you keep a deferred pension. You lose access to ill-health retirement.
Can I claim unfair dismissal if I resign?
Not unless the resignation is a constructive dismissal, which needs a fundamental breach of contract by the employer and is hard to prove. Discrimination, harassment, victimisation and whistleblowing claims do not need a dismissal or a qualifying period. The time limit is generally six months from 1 October 2026 after Acas early conciliation.
Does resigning stop a police investigation?
No. Police and the CPS decide whether to investigate and prosecute regardless of employment. HMPPS policy says a criminal investigation takes primacy in corruption cases. Contact the POA and a criminal solicitor if you are arrested or invited to an interview under caution.
Should I resign to avoid a dismissal on my record?
Think very carefully and take union or legal advice first. Resigning does not avoid exclusion, vetting action or a criminal case, and it gives up your hearing, appeal and unfair dismissal rights. In some situations a negotiated exit with independent legal advice may be sensible, but do not decide under pressure.
Sources
- assets.publishing.service.gov.ukGOV.UK: Exclusion from Working for HMPPS Policy Framework (issued 14 October 2024, in force 1 January 2025)
- assets.publishing.service.gov.ukGOV.UK: Counter Corruption and Reporting Wrongdoing Policy Framework (re-issued 10 May 2022)
- legislation.gov.uklegislation.gov.uk: SI 2014/1964 Part 12 Chapter 3 (regs 165 to 169)
- assets.publishing.service.gov.ukGOV.UK: Security Vetting PSI 07/2014, AI 05/2014, PI 03/2014 (revised 20 February 2025)
- gov.ukGOV.UK Employment Tribunal decisions: Hayes v Secretary of State for Justice, 6018279/2025 (published 29 September 2026)
- gov.ukGOV.UK: Make a claim to an employment tribunal
- gov.ukGOV.UK: Plan to Make Work Pay and Employment Rights Act timeline update (25 September 2026)
- legislation.gov.uklegislation.gov.uk: Employment Rights Act 2025 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional and Saving Provisions) Regulations 2026, SI 2026/559
- poauk.org.ukPOA: legal services and Legal Advice Scheme handbook (England, Wales and NI)
- sps.gov.ukSPS Code of Conduct, policy HR010/001 (published 23 February 2018)
- cps.gov.ukCPS legal guidance: Misconduct in public office (7 July 2023)
- legislation.gov.uklegislation.gov.uk: Prison Act 1952, section 40B
- bills-api.parliament.ukUK Parliament Bills API: Public Office (Accountability) Bill (status 2 October 2026)